Recall Denied Finality

The Bench declined to recall its earlier final judgment, holding that no sufficient or exceptional ground had been demonstrated to justify reopening a concluded decision. 

The Court made it clear that recall jurisdiction cannot be invoked as a substitute for appeal or review. 

The applications were dismissed, reaffirming the principle that final judgments attain conclusiveness and can only be disturbed in the rarest cases involving manifest error, procedural injustice, or similar compelling circumstances.