Remedy Deferred Justice Delayed

This case highlights a recurring institutional gap where Tribunals, though constituted, are not functional. 

The Court observed that litigants cannot be denied access to justice on the ground of alternate remedy when such remedy is illusory in practice. 

It directed the authorities to clarify the operational status of the Tribunal and proceeded to entertain the matter, reinforcing that procedural structures must translate into real access to adjudication.