Section 68 Misapplied
By J the App
Executive Summary
This ruling reinforces a critical limitation on revenue powers:
Suspicion, even if strong, cannot substitute evidence.
The Tribunal emphasized that:
• Section 68 requires books of account + unexplained credit
• In presumptive taxation (Section 44AD), books may not exist at all
• Additions under Section 69C cannot be made on pure presumption (e.g., assumed commission payments)
The case is a strong rebuttal to the increasingly common practice of treating bank entries and invoices as insufficient without physical corroboration.
Issues for Determination
1. Whether Section 68 can be invoked in absence of books of account (Section 44AD case). ...
Read the full article in the app
This is a premium article. Download J the App to read the complete content.